#1 Mold
Scam: "Free" Mold Inspections
Offered By Mold Inspectors Who Also
Perform Mold Removal
The biggest mold scam is and always has been
– “mold inspectors” who are also in the mold
removal business. You'll see their
advertisements, "FREE PROFESSIONAL
INSPECTION" - "FREE SAMPLES WITH EVERY JOB",
but don't be misled. No one is in business
to do anything for free. Free always comes
with a hefty price that ends up costing far
more than you thought it would. That Free
Professional Mold Inspection may sound
pretty good at first, but nothing good is
ever free, and never has that been more true
than in the mold business. The simple truth
is:
- Anyone in the mold removal business
offering mold inspections (either for a
fee or for free) is doing so for one
reason only - to find mold removal jobs.
Their inspections are specifically
designed to drum up expensive mold
removal work. If and when they actually
do find mold, the problem and the work
they claim is necessary to fix it is
often grossly exaggerated. But even
worse, sometimes there really is no mold
problem at all. Sometimes an expensive
mold remediation job is sold just
because of a water stain. That may be
hard for most honest people to imagine,
but it happens every day. For more
information on this scam and actual
examples of folks who have fallen prey
to it, check out
The Mold Inspectors Blog.
- Also, any mold inspector offering a
few free mold samples with every
inspection does so just to get a foot in
the door so they can sell you a lot more
samples that you probably don't need.
Mold removal (also known as mold
remediation or mold abatement) is a very
profitable business and engaging in both
mold inspections and mold remediation is a
serious conflict of interest. The potential
for fraudulently creating thousands of
dollars in bogus mold removal work is
tremendous and - unfortunately - an every
day occurrence in this industry.
This is the oldest mold scam going and
its easy to pull off because most consumers
(like you) don’t know enough about mold to
realize when they’re being bamboozled into
work that often grossly exaggerated, and in
some instance, may not even need to be done.
REMEMBER: You do not want a mold
inspector who is looking for mold removal
jobs. They always find (or create) what
they’re looking for.
Convenience can cost you.
Most people prefer to deal with one
contractor for everything because its
convenient. But when it comes to mold, that
convenience can end up costing you thousands
of dollars in bogus repair work. It is
simply not worth the risk. A mold inspection
should be completely unbiased. Mold
inspectors should have no personal interest
in how an inspection turns out, nor should
they ever profit from what they find, either
directly by doing the removal themselves, or
indirectly by referring work to their
friends for a kick-back.
Avoid the scam.
The only way to ensure you will get an
unbiased inspection report and avoid this
mold scam is to hire a Certified Mold
Inspector who does not perform mold removal
work.
Tell us your experience.
If you have any experience with this mold
scam we want to hear from you. Tell us and
others by posting your story on our
Mold Inspectors Blog.
#2
Mold Scam: Duct Cleaners using a “Field Test
Kit” or “Instant Mold Test”
Many Duct Cleaning companies are owned and
operated by honest and reliable owners and
they offer a valuable service. However, some
“Duct Cleaners” or other untrained mold
inspection service providers have perfected
this scam. They offer a very low “Duct
Cleaning” service to get their foot in your
door. When they show up to clean your ducts
they offer you a free mold test OR they
claim to find hidden mold in the duct work.
They basically scare you into a very
expensive “spray treatment” and sign you up
for a regular “treatment service”. This is a
very bogus and risky proposition.
How To Avoid It:
The best way to avoid this scam is to avoid
using a service provider that uses “Instant
Mold Tests” to conclusively determine if you
have a mold problem or not. The
manufacturers of these field test kits
specifically state in their literature that
a positive test result should be followed up
with laboratory testing. Furthermore the EPA
specifically recommends AGAINST using a
biocide as the sole source of remediation.
The biocide used by these scam artists may
be much more dangerous than the mold that it
is being used to control. The EPA recommends
“physical removal” of any mold or mold
damaged building materials. Another
interesting note is that many modern homes
use a vinyl or plastic “flex duct” that will
not even support mold growth, but can also
be damaged by improper duct cleaning. If you
are going to use a firm to clean your ducts
make sure that they are a National Air Duct
Cleaners Association (NADCA) member and
verify this yourself online – don’t take
their word for it. We have had reports from
consumers that these con-men always seems
like the nicest and most believable guys in
the industry.
#3
Mold Scam: Free Post-Remediation Clearance
Testing
The final step in the mold removal process
is a post-remediation survey to verify and
document that the remediation was
successful. If you are paying for the
remediation work out-of-pocket, you will
want confirmation that the mold problem is
gone before making the final payment to your
contractor. If the remediation is being paid
for by your insurance company or required by
a mortgage lender, they will typically
require a third-party clearance test before
payment or funding.
REMEMBER:
- Post-remediation clearance testing
should never be performed by a mold
removal contractor waiting to get paid
for his work. This is no different than
a student grading his own final exam.
Many mold remediation contractors even
offer "FREE" clearance testing. Some
will include it in the price of the job.
But it is never in your best interest to
let a contractor grade his final exam.
With hundreds, if not thousands of
dollars on the line and no way to charge
you more if it fails, it is highly
unlikely that a mold contractor will
fail his own work.
- Post-remediation clearance testing
should always be done after all the mold
has been removed but before any
re-construction work begins so the
inspector can visually see that there is
no mold left on the remediated
materials.
Avoid the scam.
The way to avoid this scam is the same as
Mold Scam #1. Have you post-remediation
survey and clearance test performed by a
Certified Mold Inspector who does not work
for your remediation contractor.
- Is mold growing or has mold growth
occurred indoors
- What conditions were and/or are the
likely cause
- What areas of the structure are
effected
- What conditions are still likely to
promote further mold growth
- What steps should be taken properly
address your mold issue
#4
Mold Scam: Encapsulating Mold
Encapsulation is a trade term used by some
mold removal contractors to describe the
process of “gluing down” any mold they may
have missed during remediation.
Anti-microbial coatings used as encapsulants
can be sprayed on, rolled or brushed like
paint, but paint (including KILZ) is neither
an anti-microbial coating nor an acceptable
encapsulation product.
As a final step in the mold remediation
process, encapsulating a few loose spores to
avoid failing a post-remediation test is not
a scam. However, encapsulation as a
stand-alone solution for mold remediation is
nothing more than covering up mold that
should have been removed, and that is a
total scam.
Why And When To Encapsulate
In the remediation process a contractor will
remove and discard construction materials
that are permanently damaged or would cost
more to clean than replace. Any salvaged
materials, such as framing lumber, that
shows evidence of mold growth is then
scraped, sanded, and wire brushed until all
visible mold growth is removed.
At that point the remediation is finished
and ready to be tested. However, in some
instances it is not possible to completely
remove every last bit of mold trapped in
small cracks and crevices without removing
costly structural framing. And while a few
spores of Chaetomium, Stachybotrys or
Aspergillus are unlikely to ever pose a
threat as long as those cracks and crevices
never get wet again, the dilemma is this; as
long as certain molds that are considered
markers* (indicators) of indoor mold growth
show up in a post-remediation air test, you
cannot document that the mold remediation
was successful – unless of course your mold
inspector is one who will report his opinion
rather than a traceable industry standard.
But the integrity of that report will come
under scrutiny at some point, either by your
insurance company, your mortgage lender, or
a prospective buyer when you go to sell the
property in the future. Under such
conditions, if all visible mold growth has
been removed and all salvaged materials have
been dried to industry standards,
encapsulating a few rogue mold spores is an
acceptable step as long as :
- The encapsulant product itself is
clear (not a solid color) so that during
the Post-Remediation Verification
Survey, which includes a visual
inspection and moisture assessment of
all remediated construction materials,
your third-party mold Inspector can
visually confirm that all materials
under the encapsulant are clean and mold
free. Many mold remediation contractors
use solid color encapsulants to cover up
mold that was not removed. Some even
paint over mold with KILZ, which is a
stain-killing paint with no
anti-microbial properties whatsoever.
Remember, you pay your contractor to
remediate mold. You pay your Inspector
to confirm that the contractor did what
you paid him to do. Be sure to have this
discussion with your contractor before
the work begins. Ask him directly if he
intends to encapsulate or use any
anti-microbial sealants or coatings. If
the answer is yes, insist on clear
products only.
- Encapsulation is not to be done as a
method of mold remediation. As obviously
ludicrous as that sounds (and is) it is
exactly what many contractors do and it
is nothing less than a fraudulent mold
scam. Encapsulation is never an approved
or acceptable method of mold
remediation.
Avoid the scam.
There are two things you can do to avoid
being scammed by encapsulation. If your
contractor objects to either, find another
contractor.
- As stated above, before the
remediation work begins, ask your
contractor if he intends to encapsulate
or use any anti-microbial sealants or
coatings. If the answer is yes, insist
on clear products only and insist that
the product brand name and ID number is
spelled out in the contract. The best
and most widely used clear encapsulants
are Fiberlock Aftershock Fungicidal
Coating and Foster 40-51 Fungicidal
Protective Coating.
- Before your contractor applies an
encapsulant, ask him to take you into
the containment area (the work area).
You may encounter some resistance, but
this is a perfectly normal and justified
request. If it is safe for him to be in
there, it is safe for you. Once inside,
ask him to show you what materials will
be encapsulated and explain to you why
he believes encapsulation is necessary.
Then ask to see the encapsulant product
to be used and ask to see the empty
containers afterward.
If these suggestions seem strong, they
are intended to be. Thousands of property
owners who have been scammed by contractors
who, “seemed so nice, seemed so honest and
so knowledgeable.” If you are uncomfortable
making such demands on your contractor, AMI
offers on-site project management services
with or without the Post-Remediation
Verification Survey. This service will
insure that every detail at every step of
the remediation process is done with your
best interest in mind.
* Stachybotrys and other
marker types: Certain types of mold, such as
Aureobasidium, Chaetomium, Fusarium,
Trichoderma, and Ulocladium, are generally
found in very low numbers outdoors.
Consequently their presence indoors, even in
relatively low numbers, is often an
indication that these molds are originating
from growth indoors. When present, these
mold types are often the clearest indicator
of a mold problem.
#5
Mold Scam: Killing Mold
Sounds like a good idea, but is it
really?
To understand this premise you must first
understand the different characteristics
between molds that are viable (alive) and
molds that are dead (non-viable). Once you
do it will be clear why killing mold is not
a good option for dealing with a mold
problem.
The one important detail most people
never knew.
Viable Mold
Molds are living organisms that require food
and water to stay alive. Take away one or
the other and mold dies. Molds produce two
things; enzymes to digest organic matter and
spores to reproduce. Outdoors mold is a
vital part of our ecosystem. Without it we
would be neck-deep in dead plant matter and
other organic materials. But indoors mold
can be a real problem when it starts
digesting organic materials like lumber,
drywall, cabinets, and other personal
property. As long as mold has a food source
and a water source, it can live indefinitely
and cause significant damage to anything it
comes in contact with.
Non-Viable Mold
When mold loses its food or water source it
dies or goes dormant. At that point, the
good news is it can no longer cause any
further damage to your property. The bad
news is, as mold dies it dries out and
starts to release spores into the air at a
highly accelerated rate, and mold spores –
dead or alive – have the same affect on
people and animals.
(READ THAT AGAIN!)
So, if dead mold is just as harmful alive
mold – what would be the point in killing
it?
Mold spores are organized into three groups
according to human responses;
- Allergenic
Most likely to affect those who are
already allergic or asthmatic
- Pathogenic
Serious health effects in persons with
suppressed immune systems
- Toxigenic
Capable of causing serious health
effects in almost anybody
Dead mold may provide your property with
some reprieve. But there is clearly no
upside to killing mold when it comes to the
potential health risks associated mold
exposure – dead or alive. For that reason,
the goal of mold remediation never to kill
mold – it is always to remove mold.
Who
Promotes the Idea of Killing Mold and Why?
Follow The Money
Mold-Killing Products
So who would have you believe that killing
mold is a good idea and why? Anyone making
money selling products and services that
kill mold. Search Google for ”how to kill
mold”. What you will find is 500,000 web
sites selling products that supposedly “kill
mold”. Check out the cleaning products isle
at your local grocery store and you’ll find
a number of mold-killing solutions to choose
from. And of course there’s the home
remedies that have been around for years,
like bleach, vinegar, baking soda, etc. But
even if a remedy or a retail product works,
the question that begs asking is, “what is
the point in killing mold?”
Mold-Killing Services
If you spend a few dollars on a mold-killing
solution, the most you’ll be out is a few
dollars. The real mold-killing scam,
however, is the thermal or ”high-heat”
treatments being passed off as mold
remediation by some contractors. Can extreme
heat kill mold and other indoor
contaminants? Yes. But again, the question
to ask is, “what is the point in killing
mold?”. Whatever technical catch phrase they
come up with to sell their concept, killing
mold is not mold remediation. Remediation
means removing mold. In the simplest of
terms, if mold is properly remediated
(removed) there should be nothing left to
kill.
Other products and services being sold as
mold-killers are Ozone air purifiers and
high ozone treatments. Ozone is a colorless,
toxic gas with a noticeable odor. When
inhaled in relatively low amounts, ozone can
cause chest pain, coughing, shortness of
breath, damage the lungs and irritate the
throat.
Regarding contractors who sell high ozone
treatments as a method of mold remediation,
the truth is - the amount of ozone it takes
to kill mold will kill you too! But even if
you check into a hotel for a few days while
they while they fill your house with lethal
doses of deadly gas, the best you can hope
for in the end is dead mold. And just like
high heat treatments, remediation will still
be required to remove it.
As for ozone products, manufacturers and
resellers of Ozone Generators sold as air
purifiers claim that these products help to
kill and control mold. However, according to
the Environmental Protection Agency, (EPA),
these products may very well add to indoor
air pollution and even make indoor mold
conditions worse.
Several brands of ozone generators have EPA
“establishment numbers” on their packaging.
This is NOT an EPA approval or endorsement.
It is nothing more than deceptive marketing
designed to intentionally mislead consumers.
The only purpose of an EPA establishment
number is to help the EPA identify the
specific facility that produces the product.
THE DISPLAY OF THIS NUMBER ON OZONE PRODUCTS
DOES NOT IMPLY IN ANY WAY THAT EPA HAS FOUND
THE PRODUCT TO BE EITHER SAFE OR EFFECTIVE.
FROM EPA’s WEB SITE:
Q: Are Ozone Generators Effective in
Controlling Indoor Air Pollution?
A: Available scientific evidence
shows that at concentrations that do not
exceed public health standards, ozone has
little potential to remove indoor air
contaminants. Some manufacturers or vendors
suggest that ozone will render almost every
chemical contaminant harmless by producing a
chemical reaction whose only by-products are
carbon dioxide, oxygen and water. This is
misleading. The EPA does not certify or
endorse any air cleaning devices or
recommend air cleaning devices or
manufacturers.
For more information from the EPA regarding
the use or effectiveness of ozone
generators, please visit their web site at:
www.epa.gov/iaq/pubs/ozonegen.html |